Bromothymol Blue And Plant

and reality TV

Intercultural Community Radio 800 AM and FM Wajzugun

seeking solidarity Pocahullo Regional, National and International.

denounce against public opinion in our country and abroad,

a smear campaign and pointers maneuvers

Party government in the Province of Neuquén.

Executive Directorate and inter-community radio station AM 800

Wajzugun and Management FM Community Radio Pocahullo

want to give some awareness of the existence of plans to attack these means of communication

in the City of San Martin de los Andes.



On Monday 19 and Wednesday 21 November 2007, the directors of

these community stations, we had the obligation to file two

prosecutions were turned to the Prosecutor of the Fourth Judicial District

, based in Junin de los Andes,

after a group of people led by the pointer of the Popular Movement Neuquen

Ariel Epulef, concocted burning facilities station and

violating the transmission plant. In that same conversation

also spoke of ending the life of one of the radio journalists.

threats stem from the information and treatment they gave

these stations, when a group of residents in the Mapuche Community

headed by Ariel Curruhuinca Epulef and Oscar Curruhuinca

give an institutional coup to the authorities of Community itself

trying to dismiss the Board of the Community and putting in place

called authorities "Natural."



The principle of this is back to negotiations is

to the Government of Jorge Sobisch, before leaving the administration, on granting

Chapelco, since it is due and this

retreating government is doing the dirty work for

successor will be the same party, the governor-elect Jorge Sapag.



The Snows of Chapelco company in charge of the family Adrogue

intended to stay for 25 years with the granting of Chapelco to this

have made negotiations with the provincial government by Jorge Sobisch;

but what happens is that the ski slopes and much of
complex
winter, as well as access roads are within the Community
Curruhuinca
Mapuche, who through his directive, now try

out at a stroke, they rejected an offer from the provincial government makes a

month and a half ago.

The problem is evident when residents of Spot payload,

community members, decide to separate because

irrational exploitation has led to the groundwater and streams downstream from the solid contaminated

by sewage and do not have access to this vital resource.



media worker and treatment of the incident by

these community radio stations have discovered,

destabilizing maneuvers, as well as the business that is trying to consummate a

expense of the health of hundreds of people.



For the above and in front of the seriousness of the facts is that they ask
all good people, organizations and mass communication
express their solidarity.
In order to get mail from the Communications AM 800 Wajzugun is
radioam800@smandes.com.ar, the Radio is
fmpocahullo@smandes.com.ar Pocahullo

No more deaths and street gangs in the province of Neuquén.

How Much Is The Sims 2 Expansion Pack Mac

Idea for a March 24 ...

hope you liked the video and especially they can even feel what a FLIA: a party where we all share and celebrate the culture.
If it were to not miss the next one is organized on 9 December at the Mercado de Flores, Ramon L. Falcon 2714 (one block from Rivadavia Avenue and three of Plaza Flores)

If Bump Is Herpes And Popped On Lip

on a photo and a very nice paradox

What I do not believe, what we believe and what we want with this paper

worth clarifying the outset that we respect the political position in favor of any person and only try to give our opinion on the vote. In order to submit a proposal for those who are in doubt that they will decide in the coming elections and to discuss the various positions in order to strengthen our opinion. We come not to impose the truth but to create a space for discussion on the basis of our choice and opinion.

We do not go at night to paint the walls that say "Vote White" because we believe that this is not served or rather not come, because it has no foundation and allows each one to make a liberal interpretation of the whys. For example Aldo Rico or Patti (¿ex?-Repressors), they may support abstention Dedication to vote but to what effect? \u200b\u200b... certainly quite contrary to ours, so I'll try to explain with some support, within my means, our decision, trying to leave no doubt what our position (fully democratic).

decided ABSTAIN VOTING. In a elections is considered "abstainers" who do not go to the polls ( passive abstention) and the voters who cast blank votes and null ( active abstention) 1. is not the purpose of this paper to define and establish the differences between these decisions, which are, so we only introduce on this subject briefly, to clarify and refute the fact that the total white vote positively for the candidate has more votes. The blank or null votes do not add in any way votes to any candidate, but has an entirely opposite to what we (the mass media, the politicians, the powerful ...) want to believe. There is no exact definition or meaning of the combination consisting of the white vote and vote no, since no legislation about and is a subjective construction which can make them. Thus, for example, the white vote is open to different interpretations, "some people think that those who practice the black vote in his or her opinion against all candidates in the race, and some people warned that this view is expressed instead by the vote null and blank votes actually expresses indifference to the choices in an election " 2. For others, the invalid vote "is claim and an instrument of legitimization of a particular electoral or political system. " 3

Therefore both options are a clear representation of dissatisfaction and complaint either with the political parties and / or the electoral system and serve to not continue to feed the false democracy we live in . The only vote that adds up to a candidate is leading the ballot this. For us the decision is one and is to abstain, passively or actively, varies between us, "joins us and a large No of different tones Yes" .

Why not believe in political parties and the electoral system?

relatively widespread ...

At the time of voting, throughout our history the game was predominantly (except for certain partnerships and other monsters) between Radical and Peronist. Our old had to choose one of two options. Or as a third vote for the least worst option, usually matches "left." Is ie most of the time the fight is between two candidates and the rest is left behind. Vote for the least worst would vote for those candidates who are known before hand that not only will win but not even going to be one of the two favorites. What was the outcome of these decisions? ... I think we all know: 8.7% of desempleo.10, 3 million of them poor and 3.3 million homeless. Infant mortality 14.29 deaths per 1000 births. Illiteracy: 3% of those over 15 do not read or write. 4 could go on paying off these "bad government", who ruled us and govern us ("legitimized" in the vote ...), the people who are not overturned in numbers, for example, the murder of a teacher in Neuquen Sobisch by the governor, now running for the presidential elections in October, the 10-year renewal of the broadcasting law (in force since the military proceedings) 5 hunger or death of a baby in Salta. But the text would be endless. Only these figures show relatively , the reality we live for decades. I say decades, I think it's clear why they remain the same as always those who govern us. I think that "all must go" was never heard in the pink house, was a cry-coated thin any hypocrisy, because when everything is stabilized, anger was the middle class love and feathering in the pan was slowly forgetting their claim and the well ... and won again in first round, the elections of 2003 a certain Carlitos.

Why not now believe in the electoral system? In order to curl not much I'll use a very clear example written by my colleague Damian that will leave explicit the reason for our disagreement. Quote: To support my words I'm going to be based on a practical example and recent elections for head of government in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires. Clarín entitled: "Sure victory opponent: Macri swept Capital ", The Nation:" Double drop Kirchner: Macri won in the capital and in Tierra del Fuego, ARI ", page 12:" Large capital triumph Macri, yellow fever. " In any covers of the three leading newspapers, indicate that "the election result represents not only the lowest rate of voters in all elections for head of government had so far, but also the lowest in any election presidential or even legislation since the re-vote in 1983. "The above quotation comes from an article Lavaca site.

Contrast the "Macri swept capital" Clarín with the number of votes obtained Macri of 39.10%. But how, if at all sides said Macri won with 60% of the vote? Twister presentation of data, that 60% actually "sweeping" is the percentage of votes obtained in the positive votes Macri (Ni missing or blank or contested, etc.) Actually people who chose one or other candidate was only 63% of the entire pattern. Subtleties: Is the same as saying that Macri won with 60% (without clarifying that it is the votes positive) to say that Macri won with 39.10% of the votes of the total register? Obviously not, that the latter would say that democracy is in deep trouble, because if one feels represented 39% and 61% non-represented (the sum of those who voted Filmus, 24%, and those that did not vote, or voted blank, contested, and so on., 37%) would be talking about something that goes against the principles of our political system or is not about doing what the majority wants? Is it "democratic" Macri comes to power with only 39% of the vote? Why newspapers say Argentinos Macri's victory was overwhelming? 6

We will not ever believe in an electoral system by which a candidate wins with 39.10% of the votes of the total pattern.

But then if we do not believe in political parties nor in the electoral system Do not believe in democracy?

From what we

Just believe in democracy: Demo-: Pueblo,-cracy: government.

"Democracy: Political system in which sovereignty resides in the people and exercised directly or indirectly by this." In our case indirectly, as it is a representative democracy: the people govern through their representatives . Representatives "? (I follow the example above) How will be my representative Macri if I did not choose nor 61% of the population of either Federal Capital?

For this and million more reasons, we do not live in a democracy but we believe survive in a false democracy , which consists of participation false, false assemblies, double standards (government official) and others.

Then we are not to misunderstand us, intentionally or unintentionally saying "these are re fascists do not believe in democracy." We do believe in democracy, ie believe in that thing never still live. And things that never lived and now want to call it Utopia. What we believe then? In Utopia. How do I get to it?

"What we're trying to do is change the glass to see the problem. When an organization or political party does see the problem with the glass that what is at stake is the seizure of power. We say, what if we remove the glass as you remove the camera lens to look closer or further away. And instead of that we do not take the power but the exercise of power . So if we look to the government, not the actor of the changes, but how the administrator of these changes are being sought. " 7

That is what we believe: the power of the people and not making power. This power and these changes are in town. So we talked to the people we interviewed, not a leader politician to tell us how many works he began to do 3 months before the election. How do I use the asphalt in front of my house if "10.3 million" people survive below the poverty line?

At this time we do not care who is up, we believe in one hand, and from below.

We believe that everything is solved with the abstention (passive or active) to vote. Because otherwise I might ask What if a majority would agree and would abstain to vote?
I think that time is not coming. And mine is not pessimism, but from our view, before reaching that level, where a union people have so much to have such a unanimous decision, it may achieve several more wins like that of an electoral system reform. The abstention from voting is the most outstanding opportunity to demonstrate our dissatisfaction and "only" that, if not accompanied by actions. In contrast, if only we decline to vote and started several actions to strengthen democracy, culture, freedom, etc., Exercising the power we have, then we are going to be talking about a complete proposal to reach a full democracy .

About what we want with this paper

All writing has an intention of this is simply to invite reflection, discussion, think how important it is that packet to get into the ballot box. And also to reaffirm the idea that have to rewrite the history . The other story.

And if any "major" tells me "but that's crazy, a utopia," I'll answer: "When I was little You told me to meet all my dreams, why now I say otherwise? "

Do they fought for something. Those who did were the permits, to no: NO.

Notes
1 Information from Wikipedia.
2 Idem 1.
3 Idem.
4 Data extracted from source Clarin not specified (I think that INDEK. If so, I do not believe in them.) Mid-2007.
5 View Eco magazine number 1. Note Radios and censorship. 6
blogrevistaeco.blogspot.com / Article: Sunday July 1, 2007
Democracy is in the oven: a practical example of the death of candidates "elected" by the people.
7 Subcomandante Marcos.

Where Do You Go To Get To Broks Gym Pokemon Hg

Only one question prompts me to write these lines: Why, in general, society knows more about who is Paris Hilton and less who is Subcomandante Marcos? Leaving ideology aside, would not it be good for all to communicate in the same measure? The cultural industry of mass media is committed to get us only part of the hood. In my view this is harmful for everyone, because if ever see a tree in spring, never know what the winter. I'm not saying be "critical gift" and analyze everything with a magnifying glass, but if bogo because at least we think that every face has a counterpart in this world and more categories of good and bad. I mean, suddenly it is sometimes good dive for other waters. Because there are "other waters" and other visions. It is sometimes necessary to break the bottle and discovered that there are as many reasons as there are heads in the world "So everything is relative? No, just that nothing is absolute. In a book I read talk about something called naive nihilism, the idea was interesting. According to Wikipedia Nihilism (from the Latin, meaning nihil 'nothing') is the negation of all principle, authority, philosophical or religious dogma. Nihilism is a philosophical position which argues the world, and especially human existence, so really do not have any objective meaning, purpose, comprehensible truth, or essential value than . And what is about naive nihilism what they had been talking about? Everything and nothing. A nihilist is someone naive who believes and is convinced that no good and is disappointed the world, but, and here is that naive in my view, to be disappointed about something you first have to be excited that something how to believe in anything if you never thought you? Like to think that everything does not matter if from when I wake up I go to bed I'm choosing between things that are different: salty or sweet, grapefruit or orange, yin or yang. I speak which we can choose, tinquiritos bourgeoise, the other, the nobodies, are another matter. I'm disappointed a person who fought with the ERP and saw their dreams fade, I understand, believe in something and now does not believe in anything. But we, the new blood, young bourgeoise what are we disappointed?, What ended the Menem decade?, What Argentina did not go champ?. A copy disappointed me to see as our own and not, we are letting the generational opportunity to do things, but then do not go and then we unbelievers. But then, the key is that, later. Now, today, we have to believe and give value to the word utopia and do not talk about big things, talk to reassess our right to dream or to vote against bad government, or to say, I do care, or going to a march, or write, paint, sing, but all that with a goal. We have more outlets than the "joint world forget, forget the beer penalties and Ribotril (capitalism found solutions to our ills, ills). We must, as noted in the tinquirito Fer, write the blank. Writing each and together we can rewrite history. Because if we are nothing, "our children are going to be? nothing, nothing. Because if so, we burn the cities, books, movies, computers and live in balls, total if nothing matters, everything is the same. Fallacy, nobody gives you all the same, sometimes it's more comfortable to sink into the mire of deception to drag their knees on the stone of illusion. And yes, you do not mind anything, today's most common and accepted that you care about something, because when something you care about your old, some people look at you with weird face and thinking about your future will convey their disappointment and their battles lost and show you that since the world began losing good and ill win and you best armes a future push you that little bit of a dreamer that you got to the corner and responsibilities vested in you You are going to have or you got. Eye, I say take the idiot with the responsibilities, must be fulfilled, but need not be all. In other words, horse racing was a movement that has passed. We must dream and work and better if you can work for change. I do not know what I'm getting, but if I tell me a while to get me out of nowhere off and making a magazine and thinking I feel better, as le'r an agenda (a phrase that is not signed) "Tomorrow you may have to sit in front of my children and tell them that we lost ... we did not know how to do to win, but I could not look them in the eye and say that they live well because I do not anime fighting. " And so, if we have the means we sink into nothing and accept to know about Paris Hilton and do not know about Subcomandante Marcos I think we're wandering (I want to be clear, Subcomandante Marcos or Videla The important thing is to see the whole field).

And my sincere apologies last line, I love everyone who reads this leave a comment, not to feed my ego, but to know that there are heads behind the monitors who suffer and feel things like to which I go and more important to know that this does not render anything. Putenme, disagree, agree, scream, send viruses, but we no no, I already did something small, throw the pebble cover eco doxa and desire.

Tinquirito signs in addition to Eco called Aureliano.